Books vs Movies: What Data Shows About Differences Between
Page and Screen

Photo by Yosuke Ota (@yosuke_ota) The argument has been around for decades: books vs. movies. Some say nothing compares to the intimacy of holding a novel, others swear by the thrill of a cinematic screen. But beyond personal taste, there's science, psychology, and raw numbers that reveal how differently we experience stories.
This article pulls together data on reading and viewing, from brain scans to time-use surveys, to answer one question: what really happens when we trade the page for the screen? The goal isn't to crown a winner, but to map the differences in how books and movies shape memory, imagination, and culture.
Source: https://unsplash.com/photos/two-books-on-grass-OlvgW1LhghQ
Books vs Movies Statistics
To make sense of this debate, we looked at a range of research: fMRI and EEG studies on brain activity, U.S. and global surveys on leisure habits, and industry revenue reports. The scope covers both cognitive effects and cultural consumption, giving a balanced view of how people interact with stories.
Leading the analysis is Ryan Acton, an education expert from the essay writing service EssayHub, who has studied how students consume narratives across formats. For students who find they lack the time to finish all their reading and writing assignments, they may opt to get an essay written for me to manage their workload. His work compares how reading versus watching affects comprehension, focus, and long-term retention.
Here's a snapshot of the numbers:
|
Metric (U.S. unless specified)
|
Books
|
Movies
|
|
Average leisure reading time per day (Adults)
|
~20 minutes
|
~2.5–3 hours of TV or video
|
|
Median daily reading time (Teens, 15–19)
|
9 minutes
|
1.3 hours of games/screen leisure
|
|
Average daily reading time (Seniors, 75+)
|
46 minutes
|
4+ hours TV
|
|
% of adults engaging annually
|
48.5% read at least 1 book in 2022
|
~83% watched TV yesterday (Pew)
|
|
Global industry revenue
|
~$100–120 billion (publishing)
|
~$40–50 billion (global box office)
|
|
Long-term trend (2004–2018)
|
Leisure reading time dropped from 23 to under 16 minutes/day
|
Screen time rose steadily (+30 minutes/day since 2013)
|
|
Brain development studies
|
More reading = larger cortical volume and stronger cognitive test scores
|
More TV = reduced cortical thickness, smaller gray matter volume long-term
|
|
Adaptation preference survey
|
67% say the book was better
|
13% preferred the movie
|
These figures show where the balance tips: people spend far more time with screens, yet the publishing industry still generates more revenue globally, and readers often prefer the depth of books when both versions exist.
Why Books Are Better Than Movies
Reading activates more regions than watching: language centers, imagination pathways, and even sensory areas when you visualize taste, touch, or motion. Movies mainly light up the visual and auditory regions.
Attention span tells a similar story. A U.S. survey found that adults who read daily for at least 30 minutes scored 20% higher on focus-based cognitive tests than non-readers. Students who read a full-length book once a month showed stronger memory retention than peers who relied only on films for the same stories.
Empathy is another key difference. A study of 1,200 participants revealed that frequent readers scored 10–15% higher on empathy tests, particularly those who read literary fiction.
So, are books better than movies?
- Reading boosts vocabulary: readers know up to 20% more words than non-readers of the same age group.
- Memory retention is stronger: people remember 30% more details from text than from film versions.
- Reading trains attention spans in ways passive viewing doesn't.
- Literary fiction improves empathy by immersing readers in the inner lives of characters.
- Books encourage critical thinking by leaving space for interpretation.
![]()
0